After spending the
last few frigid days confined to quarters, we had a chance to see Michael Moore’s
new documentary film, “Where to Invade Next.” We have seen almost all of his
films, so we have long realized that he can be a bit loose with the facts and
biased in his approach, but the audience is always left with something to
ponder or discuss.
“Where to Invade Next”
is no exception. He starts with a cartoon in which the Joint Chiefs of Staff
are asked a simple question: why has America spent so much money and lost so
many lives and wars since World War II? Rather than answering that question, he
travels around the world trying to glean solutions to some of the non-military
problems with which the United States is suffering.
He visits eight
countries, studying different aspects along the way, and here is a very brief
summary of what he finds:
|
Country
|
Service
|
Highlights
|
|
Tunisia
|
Health care
|
Government manages
health care; the film emphasized women’s health issues
|
|
Finland
|
Education
|
The excellent
public schools in Finland have been discussed quite a bit in recent years
|
|
Norway
|
Criminal justice
|
Local law
enforcement with emphasis on rehabilitation, very few guns
|
|
Germany
|
Social services
|
Government provides
excellent social support for families
|
|
Portugal
|
Drug use
|
Government has decriminalized
drugs, provides extensive rehabilitation services
|
|
Iceland
|
Gender equality
|
Government, with
persecution and imprisonment of “white collar” crimes
|
|
Slovenia
|
Education
|
Government provides
free college education
|
|
France
|
Nutrition
|
Government provides
high quality, delicious, and nutritious school lunches
|
The film is
beautifully done, with many breathtaking scenes of country sides, quaint cities,
workplaces free of tension and schools filled with happy and healthy children. It
is certainly a very interesting topic and he makes a compelling argument. At
this point you are probably waiting for the “but….,” and here it is: I just
wish he would be a bit more honest. By painting such a rosy picture of life in
these other countries, I am left wondering about what he is not showing
us. He does, at least, throw in one encouraging point at the end of the film,
reminding us that during various times in our history we have done a
better job of addressing some of these issues. We need to get back to those
ideals.
It will be a long road ahead. United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia had barely breathed his last before every one of the Republican presidential candidates insisted that they would block any nominations put forth by President Obama.
Oy.
Love,
Rebecca
No comments:
Post a Comment