My blogging history:
2012: diagnosed with and underwent treatment for Primary CNS lymphoma in my brain.
2012-2013: blogged on Caring Bridge.
2013: moved to Blogger.
2017: diagnosed with bladder cancer and blogged through 14 chemotherapy treatments and 37 sessions of radiation therapy, each with its own t-shirt and musical selection.
2018 to February 2020: Treated every 3 weeks with pembrolizumab for spread of bladder cancer to lymph nodes. As of June 2020, continue to be cancer free.
We drove up to Sharon
this morning and plan to spend the week here. We have a lot of plans with our
family. Tomorrow Barry and I are taking Eliana and Maya to Disney on Ice. On
Tuesday we are taking Joshua to an afternoon Celtics game. I am sure we will
all get together on the 1st. The children go back to school on
Thursday but we figured we might as well stay through the weekend, especially
since we haven’t been up here for two weeks.
With all those plans,
we wanted to sneak in one more movie while we were still on our own, and we
went to see “Saving Mr. Banks.” The movie is said to be based on a true story, although
I have no way of knowing just how closely it follows the reality. The story
focuses on two main characters: P.L. Travers, the author of the Mary Poppins
books, written from 1934 – 1988, and Walt Disney, whose children wanted him to
make the stories into a movie. The movie flips back and forth between the present
(the early 1960s), with Walt Disney trying to convince Ms. Travers to allow him
to make her book into a film, and the past, exploring the relationship between the
young Ms. Travers and her adoring but troubled father, who lost his battle with
alcohol and died when she was just a girl. It was a touching story, although we
both found the flipping back and forth a bit annoying after a while and thought
a few of those could have been cut, improving the flow without losing the
needed details. Nonetheless, it was, as Disney movies always are, quite
enjoyable.
Is this a movie for
children? It has a PG-13 rating by the Motion Picture Association of America:
G-13 – Parents Strongly Cautioned
Parents are urged to be cautious as the motion
picture contains some material that parents might consider inappropriate for
children under 13 years.
I can see this as it
relates to the father, whose alcoholism is not hidden and whose final decline
is painful to watch, even for this adult. Perhaps when the children are older,
we will remember this film and watch it with them.
As I have been writing this, Barry has been listening to some recordings of old NPR programs. And for the past twenty minutes I have had to stop my work on this to listen to a fascinating interview with Graham Nash. You can find it here:
A friend passed along
a link to the article I have copied here. After sharing it with some Jewish
friends and reading some of their reactions, I decided to post it here. While I
am sure some would disagree, this piece does an excellent job of expressing
some of the thoughts I have found myself having in recent years.
I was reminded of
these thoughts when our daughter told us that her family went to see The
Nutcracker. When our daughters were young, we never took them to a performance
or even listened to a recording of this because I thought of it as part of a
holiday we did not celebrate. Perhaps I was afraid that they would be too
attracted to the festivities and lose the tradition we were trying to instill.
So when I learned that two of our grandchildren had gone to see it, I felt both
joy (for them) and some guilt (that we never took their mother). The latter, I
guess, is a typical reaction of a Jewish mother.
Comedian David Steinberg (an alumnus of HTC) was a regular guest on the old Tonight Show back when Johnny Carson hosted it. He once told a humorous story about how his immigrant father would look out the window on Christmas day and hope it wouldn’t snow. When it did, he would say in resentful tones, ‘They got their White Christmas!’ Carson laughed.
I bring up this story to point out how some Jews view Christmas. They resent it. I can understand why. Until the mid twentieth century, and certainly prior to the Holocaust, Christians were not all that kind to us. They considered the Jews to be eternally responsible for their god’s death. And Jews have suffered at Christian hands since the founding of their religion. Sufferings like pogroms, the Inquisition, and the Holocaust. The resentment is clear - but in our day misguided. Christianity has had an unprecedented about face in the 20th century – starting with Vatican II. And their attitude has only improved since then. This includes not only Catholics, but Protestants as well. Especially Fundamentalist Christians who number in excess of 50 million people in this country. I’ve been though all this before. But never in the context of Christmas.
The truth is that in years past, I felt pretty much the same way. As an American who loves his country and all that it has done for me, my family, and its Jewish citizens I have always felt like I was part of this great experiment in democracy called America. Except on Christmas. During this time of year with all the music, decorations, and “Christmas Cheer” in the air, I felt like I didn’t quite belong. Not that I ever agonized over it, but I did have this somewhat uncomfortable feeling about it.
Over time, I have come to realize that Christmas as it is now celebrated in this country is more about the warm fuzzies of family, big meals, good wishes, and gifts than it is about anything religious. The theme is one of brotherhood, good will, and peace on earth. Perhaps the biggest symbol of this day is a fictional character in a red suit that hands out presents to people who have been good. The religious aspects of this holiday are left inside the church. One hardly ever hears about these religious aspects outside of it.
So when I hear Christmas music now and see the department store Santas, it does not bother me at all. Nor does it bother me when I see a Christmas tree or houses adorned with Christmas decorations (otherwise known as Sukkah decorations, especially in Israel). I think my attitude can be summed up with the following rather famous anecdote. (video below)
During Supreme Court Justice Elana Kagan’s confirmation hearings, Senator Lindsay Graham -knowing she is Jewish - asked her what she did on Christmas day. She responded “You know, like all Jews, I was probably at a Chinese restaurant.”
This really is the kind of positive attitude we should all have. It is not our day and we all do our own thing on it without any sense of being lesser Americans. We ought to respect the fact that the vast majority of Americans are Christians and celebrate this holiday in the most positive of ways. Unlike pre- Holocaust Europe, there is no intent by any of them to blame us for anything. That the world around us celebrates this holiday and we don’t does not mean we are any less American. That is built into the constitution. We ought to recognize that.
In fact I would go a step further. I agree with Rabbi Benjamin Blech who actually sees Christmas as a positive day for Jews. And that we should actually feel good about this day! Even though we have separation of church and state - America is a religious country. Most Americans believe in God (and the bible to one extent or another). ‘In God we trust!’ is printed on our currency. And as Rabbi Blech points out:
The United States identifies itself as “one nation under God.” Belief in a higher power has been the source of our divine blessing. And as Jews I think we ought to recognize that today the greatest challenge to our faith is not another faith, but faithlessness. Our greatest fear should not be those who worship in a different way but those who mockingly reject the very idea of worship to a higher power…
Living among Christians who demonstrate commitment to their religious beliefs to my mind is a far better example to my coreligionists than a secular lifestyle determined solely by hedonistic choices.
I think he’s right about that. It is long past the time to reject all the old notions about the ‘evils’ of Chrstmas and instead be happy that our Christian neighbors have religious values without any of the antiSemitism that accompanied it back in pre-Holocaust Europe. Instead of all those old negative feelings we should be happy that they still celebrate their religious beliefs.
In a somewhat related way, I want to conclude with a Berl Wein ‘Christmas story’ by Jonathan Rosenblum that was a huge Kiddush Hashem.
Rabbi Wein was once invited to meet with the Christian editor of the Detroit Free Press. The editor proceeded to tell him about his immigrant mother’s experience as as a domestic maid for an Orthodox Jewish family where the father was the president of his Shul. The family had left her to take care of the house while they went on vacation during the Christmas season.
Not knowing anything about Judaism the young girl noticed that there was no Christmas tree in the house. She was so bothered by this that she ended up spending her own money on a Christmas tree and other decorations for the house - inside and out. When the family came back, they were needless to say shocked by what they saw. How would they ever explain this to their Jewish neighbors?! Here is the rest of the story:
The head of the family entered the house contemplating how to explain the Christmas tree and lights to the members of the shul, most of whom walked right past his house on their way to shul. Meanwhile, Mary was eagerly anticipating the family's excitement when they realized that they would not be without a Christmas tree.
After entering the house, the head of the family called Mary into his study. He told her, "In my whole life no one has ever done such a beautiful thing for me as you did." Then he took out a $100 bill -- a very large sum in the middle of the Depression -- and gave it to her. Only after that did he explain that Jews do not have Christmas trees.
When he had finished telling the story, the editor told Rabbi Wein, "And that is why, there has never been an editorial critical of Israel in the Detroit Free Press since I became editor, and never will be as long as I am the editor."
The shul president's reaction to Mary's mistake -- sympathy instead of anger -- was not because he dreamed that one day her son would the editor of a major metropolitan paper, and thus in a position to aid Israel. (Israel was not yet born.) He acted as he did because it was the right thing to do.
That's what it means to be a Kiddush Hashem, to sanctify God's Name. It is a goal to which we can all strive.
For all the understanding
of the world that modern science and technology enables, I fear that we are losing
an appreciation of the English language and the rules of grammar. For years
Barry and I had a particular pet peeve that was often heard during
conversations with our daughters and their friends. When recalling a joint trip
to the mall with a friend, the speaker would say “Me and my friend went
shopping” rather than “my friend and I went shopping.” We cannot be sure how
much our hounding them helped, but as teachers of young students I am sure they
find it helpful to be conversant in basic rules of grammar.
I started thinking
about this this morning when we were listening to NPR and heard the host of the
show say “join Dave and I for this discussion…” Would I ever ask someone to “join I (or we) for
dinner?” If we cannot rely on NPR hosts to use proper English, there is little
hope for the rest of us.
My ability to read
has continued to improve, although I still require material to be in a large
font, and the effort required makes it difficult for me to read very much in
one sitting. Today something reminded us that Barry had long ago set up a
Kindle account and purchased some e-books, which would provide a good source of
material I could use to practice my reading.
It turns out that I
had purchased a few e-books during the months before my diagnosis. I have a
faint recollection of having done this in preparation for our annual trip to
St. John in February 2012. We have always spent a lot of our time there
lounging on the beach and reading. But by early 2012 I was having so much
trouble reading that I never so much as looked at that Kindle during those ten
days. You may wonder how that could have happened without loud and urgent alarms
sounding. Believe me, it is a question I ask myself quite frequently. But it is
much easier to think this way after the fact than it was before.
This afternoon we
took a look at the books we had ordered a couple of years ago. I should
probably be embarrassed to admit this, but I do enjoy light reading, and I had long
been a big fan of Faye Kellerman’s Decker/Lazarus series. There were two books
sitting on the Kindle server that I had never read. So today, after Barry downloaded
her 2012 book, Gun Games, onto my PC, where I can view it in large font
with my big screen, I was ready to go.
And then, on the very
first page, I read the following (emphasis mine):
They were coming his way: five of them—three guys, two
girls—all of them looking older than him by a couple of years but probably
still in high school.
Older than him?
It is helpful to think about the meaning of this sentence. The narrator is
describing five people who looked older than the unnamed protagonist (the “his”
at the beginning of the sentence). What Ms. Kellerman was really trying to say
was that the five people looked older than this unnamed “he” did by a couple of years. So I believe
the sentence should have read
They were coming his way: five of them—three guys, two
girls—all of them looking older than he by a couple of years but probably
still in high school.
Instead of spending
this past hour reading, I spent it venting about this, first to Barry and then
in these words. I have finished now. Thanks for indulging my outburst. Now I
can get back to trying to read!
It is December 25,
very little is open and it is quite cold outside. Our grandchildren are
visiting their other grandparents this week, so we took advantage of the
downtime and saw a couple more movies.
First, we saw “American
Hustle.” This movie was loosely based on the FBI’s ABSCAM operation
of the late 1970s and early 1980s that investigated public corruption among
elected officials. The movie had received excellent reviews, and has been
included on many critics’ “top ten” lists for this year. Despite all this, I
probably should have known that I would not particularly enjoy this movie. Not
only was it quite confusing, it is just not a topic that particularly captures
my curiosity. I do remember talk of this operation when our daughters were
young, but it was never something that particularly piqued my interest. My
feeling about the movie was that it was a waste of what I am sure many would
argue was an excellent cast. I just could not get past my dislike of the
characters or the story.
So, on a much lighter note, today we saw “20 Feet from Stardom” which focuses on the (mostly female) backup singers behind some of the top singers of the 20th century. Although much of the music was familiar, the names and faces were not. The music was terrific and uplifting, and the interviews with the stars, which included Bruce Springsteen, Mick Jagger, Stevie Wonder, and Sting, were fascinating and often heartwarming. But as lucrative as music was for these four, the same was not true for the women who provided such an integral part of their sound. The movie left us wondering how some people become big stars, while others who may be at least as talented just never make it. Like so many things in life, while talent and hard work do play a significant role, the formula for being in the right place doing the right thing at just the right time is much less well-defined. Gradually, by the 1980s or so, the role for these backup singers diminished. Although most bands that have succeeded may have a “lead singer” and even a lead composer, more often the lead vocals and composition are shared among the group. It was an enjoyable, upbeat, and interesting documentary, which I needed after the previous film we had seen.
It being December 25th, the City is rather deserted today. In the old days, people used to flock to Chinese restaurants on December 25th because they were among the few open. Kosher restaurants are open, but tend to be quite crowded. But now New York has many other ethnic establishments, including many Indian restaurants, a good number of which are vegetarian. Like many things in Manhattan, they are all clustered together along Lexington between 27th and 28th Streets. Seems funny but this is something that has always been true in Manhattan. I can remember years ago being extremely impressed with Barry’s late father: if we needed to buy something, no matter how obscure, he could advise us on precisely where to find it in New York. We tried a relatively new Indian vegetarian restaurant called Bhojan. At first it looks like a little hole in the wall but when you walk towards the back it is a lovely room. Most of the Indian restaurants have similar menus, so we ordered our usual favorites and they were very good.
Stay warm, and enjoy the time off with your families and friends if you have it.
We will be in New
York through this upcoming weekend because our children and grandchildren will
be visiting their other parents/grandparents next weekend. We have a list of
movies we hope to see, and we were able to get started on that yesterday.
The first movie we
saw was “Philomena”. The film is based on a true story in Ireland that begins in
the 1950s, as told in the book by Martin Saxsmith, Philomena: A Mother, Her
Son, and a Fifty-Year Search. Philomena was a sixteen year old high school
student who became pregnant. Apparently it was not uncommon in those situations
for girls to be sent off to live through their pregnancies and deliver their
babies in convents. To “pay” for this, they were forced into menial labor at
the convent for five years, and to sign a contract agreeing never to inquire
into their children’s whereabouts. When the babies were born, the mothers were
given limited access to them until they were adopted and simply taken away, often
with no prior notice to the mothers. This part of the story is told in
flashback. When we meet Philomena, she is looking for the baby boy she had been
given up over 50 years earlier. Against all odds, and with an amazing amount of
what you might call righteous dishonesty from everyone involved in the
separation of mother and baby, she does eventually find her son while somehow
maintaining a great deal of dignity and grace, even forgiveness. The movie,
while portraying a rather dark subject, has some very light and funny moments.
Like all such
stories, we watch this in 2013 through rather different lenses than the ones
worn by those who lived during the period this occurred. It is simply
inconceivable to us that there could be such a cruel separation of babies from
their mothers. But I have to keep telling myself that it was a very different
time and place, one we cannot appreciate through today’s definitions of good
and bad. The nuns were not completely evil, although it becomes clear that
there were financial benefits to the church from these arrangements, with the
usual rules of privacy being bent for the “right” people.
The second movie we saw was “Her.” We had seen previews for this movie quite a few times, and it seemed like a charming film, precisely what I was looking to see. I just re-watched the movie trailer (attached here), but now I am seeing it from a different perspective. While the film has many light moments, it is definitely neither a fluff piece nor a romantic comedy. In fact, it is a thoughtful look at relationships: what we seek in them and what makes them work.
The movie is set in California at an undefined future time, perhaps 10-20 years from now. Theodore, played by Joaquin Phoenix, is a young man who works as a sort of ghost writer, writing letters for people who have things to say but apparently cannot either say or write the words themselves. His wife has left him, and he is living a rather sad and lonely life when he learns about and begins running a new operating system on his computer and phone; imagine the voice of Scarlett Johannson as a sort of “Siri - plus,” who greets him in the morning, chats with him throughout the day, and has deep conversations with him at night, and you can see how his relationship with the voice quickly becomes romantic. Manohla Dargis described this well in her New York Times review:
At once a brilliant conceptual gag and a deeply sincere romance, “Her” is the unlikely yet completely plausible love story about a man, who sometimes resembles a machine, and an operating system, who very much suggests a living woman.
You know that this has to unravel, but I do not want to give away just how that happens. The end of the movie does not really tell you what the future will bring to Theodore and his (human) friend, Amy (played by Amy Adams, who is making more movies than would seem humanly possible), who also has one of these operating systems. Watch the trailer, and if you have a chance, go see the film.
The temperature is dropping today; looks like our last brief flirtation with summer will be ending shortly. The heavy rain we have been having all day could have been snow, so it’s not so bad.
We will be spending a
quiet weekend in New York this week. Barry’s dental work went fine, but he is
still recovering. I pureed the vegetable soup I had made a couple of days ago
and that turned out to be delicious! I think I will serve it that way in the
future.
I started a new
project yesterday. Somehow, although I cannot for the life of me figure out how
I managed to do something this stupid, I no longer have electronic versions of
the pictures we took of our grandchildren from 2004 when Joshua was born through
2006. But I have literally hundreds of printed photographs, all in order, in three
large albums that hold four 4x5” pictures in plastic sleeves on each page. My
plan is to select a representative sample and scan them in. Yesterday, just to
see how this would go, I scanned in a few. This in itself is not so simple,
because if the picture is sitting on the glass just a bit crookedly, it is very
hard to get the image straightened out on the page. I know you can rotate the
image, but then you end up having to cut off a bit, and somehow it is difficult
to get it just right. So after a few tries I had four pictures that I loaded onto
Shutterfly and I started a book. The pictures don’t look quite as crisp as the pictures
we have electronically do. Barry pointed out to me that I could try to increase
the resolution on the scans. Unfortunately, when I tried to do just one
picture, after being tied up for many minutes, an error message popped up and
said that it could not do it. So I may just have to settle for the fuzzy images,
which is odd when the images in my head are so clear!
I have another
project upon which I hope to embark. Recently, one of my sisters took all the
old home movies our father had taken while we were growing up and transferred
them to DVDs. I am looking forward to sharing these with the grandchildren. Meanwhile,
when Simmie was a baby, Barry and I bought a video camera that was advanced as
home movie cameras were back in the 1970s. There are 27 reels in all, and at 3
minutes each that is almost an hour and a half: stay tuned for this at Sundance!
Unfortunately, only about half are labeled. The images on the Super 8 tapes are
very tiny, so there is no way to look at them and know what they are. If I send
them off to one of the services that can transfer them onto a DVD, I have no
good way to put them in chronological order. I’m still scratching my head about
this one. If anyone has any suggestions they would be much appreciated.
Meanwhile, it looks
like there will be one last blast of relatively warm weather this weekend before
winter finally comes to stay. Maybe not warm enough for the Botanical Gardens,
but at least not so wickedly cold!
In the category of
Children’s Literature, last evening’s final Jeopardy answer was:
Joy, Nellie, and Aranea are
three of the many children of this title character.
I knew this one almost
immediately. Here is a recording of the author reading the last chapter of the book.
We watched the 1973 animated version of this book, which featured the voices of Debbie Reynolds as Charlotte and Henry Gibson as Wilbur, many times when our daughters were young. In the acknowledgements included in my PhD dissertation, I paraphrased the closing line of the book
She was
in a class by herself. It is not often someone comes along who’s a true friend
and a good writer. Charlotte was both.
and wrote of my PhD
advisor
He was in
a class by himself. It is not often someone comes along who’s a true friend and
a great statistician. Randy was both.
At the risk of embarrassing him, Randy has been a true friend and a great statistician for almost 30 years.
In February of this
year, I posted a Judy Collins song called “The Blizzard.” We again find
ourselves in a blanket of white. So I was not surprised when I began humming that
beautiful song Monday as we drove back through wooded areas of Connecticut that
“sparkled like diamonds.” It truly was a magnificent sight.
Again this week I had
to skip my music class! I am afraid I have not learned all that much about
Beethoven this term. We will not meet for the next two weeks, which leaves just
one more session for this term in early January. The weather so far does not
bode well for that session. Who says winter starts on December 22nd?
If all that white covering our yard is not winter, I fear what lies ahead!
But finally today the
weather is showing signs of improvement. It is sunny outside and the
temperature is headed to above freezing. Meanwhile, I made a big pot of
vegetable soup, motivated by the weather and by the anticipated need following
some dental work Barry is having this week.
At the end of the day
we went to see the movie “Nebraska.” Woody Grant (played by Bruce Dern) is an
older man whose brain is on the decline. Woody receives a letter telling him
that he has won one million dollars in a sweepstakes which he must claim in
Lincoln, Nebraska. Although his wife and two grown sons try to explain to him
that this is not for real and beg him not to go, he refuses to believe them and
begins making his way to Lincoln from his home in Montana. His younger son
David (played by Will Forte, who some of you may remember as one of the Saturday
Night Live regulars from 2002-2010) decides to join his father on this journey,
primarily to try to help keep him safe.
Along the way, they
stop to visit Woody’s brother and sister-in-law and their two sons, and see
many of Woody’s relatives and old friends. When they hear that Woody is
traveling to claim his prize, one by one they begin making demands that he help
them financially, even making up stories of how he “owes” them for money they
in fact never gave to him. Eventually, the extended family and friends find out
that Woody has fallen for a scam. Woody and David make it to Lincoln, and Woody
must finally accept what has happened.
The movie was shot in
black and white. There are no beautiful scenic vistas here; only a bleak open
countryside filled with poor and unhappy people who might as well be living in
the early 20th century rather than the early 21st. The
ending is not quite as dark as this all sounds, but I do not want to spoil it
for any of you who might have a chance to see this film, which we heartily
recommend. The acting was superb. Bruce Dern makes Woody seem very real, and
June Squibb (not at all a familiar face to us) is excellent as Woody’s wife,
Kate. What makes this movie so compelling is the Bruce Dern character, Woody.
Although there were some plot twists and circumstances that seemed contrived, Woody
reflected a very real situation with which many families must deal.
If you are reading this on Wednesday evening before 9 pm on the US East Coast, you can tune in to a live 20-minute internet David Roth concert by clicking here
One of the things we
made last night is a very simple and yummy dish from Sundays at Moosewood Restaurant
called Saffron Butterflies (which sounds even better in Italian, Farfalle allo Zafferano). When we were packing
to leave this morning, I found half of a half-pint container of cream in the
refrigerator. I was puzzled by this, because we had doubled the recipe for the butterflies,
which called for ½ cup of cream, so we should have used the entire container.
It turns out that when Barry added the cream, he forgot that we were doubling
the recipe. Fortunately he had remembered doubling the other ingredients, so it
was still delicious. But I thought that it seemed a bit less creamy than I had
remembered it. So note to family: we have to do this again soon!
Having all ten of us
for dinner, with so much going on afterwards, brought to mind a television show
of which we have become huge fans: Modern Family. For those who have
never watched this show, let me fill you in. Jay Pritchett, the head of the family,
is married to the gorgeous and much younger Gloria, who has a precocious
12-year-old son, Manny, from her first marriage, and she and Jay have now had a
baby boy together. Jay has two grown children from his first marriage, Claire
and Mitchell. Claire and her husband, Phil, are the parents of three kids with
whom they want an open, healthy, honest relationship: Haley, a teenage daughter
who's growing up a little fast, Alex, a too-smart-for-her-own-good middle
daughter and Luke, a scatterbrained boy. Mitchell is raising an adopted
daughter, Lily, with his long term partner, Cameron. Don’t worry if you did not
catch all that, you will not be tested! I have a hard time remembering all the
names but once you get to know these characters they do grow on you.
Like most television
situation comedies, the antics of this clan are somewhat contrived and not
especially believable. While the warmth of the interactions between these
family members does feel believable, in real life it takes work to make that
happen. There are significant differences in outlook and personality among the
family members, but they are tied together by a collective force that is far
greater than any single one of them. As parents of grown children, and
grandparents of growing-up-so-quickly grandchildren, this is what we are hoping
to achieve. And I think it is that feeling that has me hooked on this show. We
are grateful to our friends Michal and Manny for telling us about it. Our
timing was fortunate, because a variety of cable channels are showing all the
old episodes, albeit in scrambled order. We have over 40 on our playlist at
this point!
This is the time of
year that I begin to wonder if it might be time to start thinking about
relocating to a warmer climate. I guess this weather is the price I have to pay
to be close to our children and grandchildren and continue my love affair with New
York.
This video was posted
on Facebook by a friend whose sister is undergoing treatment for a
difficult-to-treat cancer. In the same way I attempt not to spoil movies, I do
not want to bias your reaction to this, so for the moment I will hold my thoughts. But I would be curious to hear some
points of view.
Visiting with my
mother and sister dredged up an old memory. Actually, it was Barry who reminded
me of this incident, which occurred shortly before I left for college.
I was the second of
five children. When I graduated high school at 18, my older brother was almost
20, and my younger sisters were 15, 12, and 5. Our family had moved from St.
Louis to West Hartford, Connecticut during the summer before my senior year. This
move forced me to give up my friends, my top-10 high school academic rank, and many
extracurricular activities. Despite this, I managed to have a pretty good
senior year and made many new friends.
On a Sunday just
after graduation, my parents planned a family day trip to the Catskill Game
Farm, a zoo in upstate New York that has since closed (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catskill_Game_Farm).
My brother and I, and
perhaps my 12- and 15-year old sisters as well, were a bit old for this sort of
thing, but I would have gone along willingly if not for the fact that one of my
friends was hosting a big graduation party that day to which everyone was going. I can still remember
the pleas and the tears. But my parents were insistent that I go with the
family.
I remember very
little of the place because, although I am sure it was lovely, and I might have
enjoyed being there with my little sister had the timing been different, I
refused to enjoy it. But clearly the memory of that day stuck with me so strongly
that over a year later, when Barry and I started dating, I was still talking
about it.
Barry and I were
reminded of this because we were thinking about taking the family to a
performance of Disney on Ice during the winter break. But we recognize that
Joshua is probably a bit old for these sorts of activities now. He might be
much happier getting together with friends than going to a show clearly targeted
at younger children. This is exactly how it should be: children grow and their
interests change, and we parents and grandparents have to shift our plans and expectations.
We see this on a regular basis during our visits to Sharon. These days, the
children’s plans with their friends often trump whatever the rest of the family
is doing. This is especially true for the Sabbath daytime meal after synagogue,
when the older children often invite friends or are invited to their homes. Although
the selfish part of me misses having them around the table, I am thrilled to
see that they are so popular!
Barry and I have had
an ongoing discussion about this for a couple of years now, wondering if at
some point our going to Sharon so frequently might not make as much sense as it
did six years ago when we started spending most of our weekends there. Maya is
only 5, so we had decided to table this discussion for another year or two. But
as it turns out, we hope to table it for much longer. Some of you already know why:
our daughter Dina and her husband Aaron are expecting a third child at the end
of March. We are excitedly awaiting this new addition to our family.
It is quite cold
outside, but I have an appointment with my pulmonologist today so I will be venturing
out. I finally get to use the new scarf that Barry bought me when he was in the
UK, along with the new wine-colored LL Bean Mad Bomber hat I bought to match
it.
Other than my last
quick “do not fear, I have not fallen off the planet” posting, it has been
about a week, and a varied and busy one, since I last wrote.
We managed to squeeze
in two movies last week. The first was “Dallas Buyers Club,” about the early
days of the AIDS epidemic when, anxious to do anything and everything to extend
their lives, patients mobilized and tried to take things into their own hands
to obtain drugs that had not been approved for sale in the United States. I was
interested in this film because when we moved to New York in 1991, my first job
was at Lederle Laboratories where I was assigned to work on a new
antiretroviral that was in the first stages of development. There was enormous
excitement about this project, that this drug would be both more effective and
less toxic than the only approved drug at that time, AZT. We got the trials up
and running quickly. I had the opportunity to work with a terrific team and to attend
fascinating meetings, many of which were attended by vocal AIDS activists. But
about 8 months in, there were three deaths among patients in the trial. The
patients were all late-stage AIDS patients, but there was concern that the drug
was not working as had been hoped, was more toxic than had been anticipated, or
perhaps both. While the jury remained forever out on precisely what caused
these deaths, there was a decision to discontinue the development of the
compound. It was just around that time that, by coincidence, I heard from
someone at Pfizer, and the rest, as they say, is history. Still, it was a
wonderful introduction to an exciting area of drug research. Some years later,
a number of former Lederle colleagues ended up at Pfizer following a merger and
reorganization.
A small afterthought
to this story I have just told. You may be amazed, as I am, that someone who
can barely remember what day of the week it is remembers this trial from over
20 years ago in such excruciating detail. This will remain forever the biggest
mystery of this whole experience.
But back to the
present…the movie was excellent, although intense and somewhat painful to
watch. The acting was superb. There may well be some Academy Award nominations
from this one.
The second movie we
saw was “Inside Llewyn Davis,” the newest feature from the incredibly prolific Coen
Brothers. This movie is supposed to be somewhat loosely based on folk
singer/songwriter Dave Von Ronck, but can likely be viewed as a composite of
many such artists who lived from hand to mouth trying to make music in the
early 1960s. The movie told the story of a reasonably talented musician who could
not quite get his act together sufficiently to be successful, and was
ultimately so self-destructive that he even passed up an opportunity to join a group
that clearly was intended to represent Peter, Paul, and Mary. The music was
fantastic, and the audience were given free CDs of the soundtrack when we
purchased our tickets. Growing up in the suburbs of St. Louis through the
1960s, this world is rather foreign to me. But Barry went to Stuyvesant High
School in lower Manhattan in the 1960s, so the gritty streets of the Village
are very real to him. I don’t know if there will be any recognition from the
Motion Picture Academy, but Oscar Isaac, who plays Mr. Davis, was quite good.
John Goodman, F. Murray Abraham, and Justin Timberlake are also in the film.
We had a quiet Friday
evening and had Sabbath lunch at the home of friends who had also invited some
other friends from our Riverdale circle. As so often happens on the short
Sabbath afternoons of winter, we ended up talking and talking until Sabbath was
over. The food was yummy, the company enjoyable, and the time just flew past.
Saturday night we
finished packing and tried to get to sleep early because we had an early flight
on Sunday. We flew down to Florida to visit my mother and sister who live
there. My mother is no longer able to travel, and we had not been down to visit
since the family Disney World trip in June of 2011, having been a bit
preoccupied through much of 2012. It was good to have the chance to visit.
We were scheduled to
fly back to New York late Monday morning. We started hearing about the terrible
weather that has been moving up the East Coast for the past few days. But
fortunately, our plane took off, albeit about an hour and a half later than
scheduled, and the flight was less turbulent than we expected. As we started
our descent, it was clear that there was a thick cloud cover over the City, but
suddenly I saw something sticking out from under that blanket of white puffy
cotton. Barry managed to snap a photograph with his iPhone. You can click on the image to make it larger and more clear.Can you see what it
is? How cool is that? It was a delightful ending to a hectic few days.